<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nike + iPod Interface Updated For New iPod Nano</title>
	<atom:link href="http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/</link>
	<description>If loving my iPod is wrong, I don't want to be right.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hutcherson</title>
		<link>http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-63296</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hutcherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-63296</guid>
		<description>I am a bit worried that the Nano 4 feels too light and is so thin that it will easily break under pressure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a bit worried that the Nano 4 feels too light and is so thin that it will easily break under pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-34200</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-34200</guid>
		<description>I'm just really mad that it's probably not compatible with the Touch.  The UK store says that it is compatible, but the US store only says Nano (doesn't exactly rule out the iPod Touch, either).  If they updated the software to work with the new Nano interface, they would have made mention if it worked with the Touch as well, right?  I'm mad because I wanted to replace my nano with a touch, and now I can't justify it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just really mad that it&#8217;s probably not compatible with the Touch.  The UK store says that it is compatible, but the US store only says Nano (doesn&#8217;t exactly rule out the iPod Touch, either).  If they updated the software to work with the new Nano interface, they would have made mention if it worked with the Touch as well, right?  I&#8217;m mad because I wanted to replace my nano with a touch, and now I can&#8217;t justify it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podophile</title>
		<link>http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-33792</link>
		<dc:creator>Podophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-33792</guid>
		<description>Well, the good news for runners and other fitness enthusiasts is that there's really no compelling reason to upgrade to the new iPod nano. By the time your current nano dies, it'll probably be time to replace that t-shirt and armband anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the good news for runners and other fitness enthusiasts is that there&#8217;s really no compelling reason to upgrade to the new iPod nano. By the time your current nano dies, it&#8217;ll probably be time to replace that t-shirt and armband anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simone</title>
		<link>http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-33783</link>
		<dc:creator>Simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-33783</guid>
		<description>I'm a bit concerned about all the Nike+ armbands and apparels that are designed with the "old" form factor: I don't think the new "fatty" will fit into the t-shirts and so on... and I'm not going to buy a new t-shirt just because the new Nano changed size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit concerned about all the Nike+ armbands and apparels that are designed with the &#8220;old&#8221; form factor: I don&#8217;t think the new &#8220;fatty&#8221; will fit into the t-shirts and so on&#8230; and I&#8217;m not going to buy a new t-shirt just because the new Nano changed size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filo OS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nike + iPod Interface Updated For New iPod Nano</title>
		<link>http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-33770</link>
		<dc:creator>Filo OS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nike + iPod Interface Updated For New iPod Nano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-33770</guid>
		<description>[...] (Via Podophile.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Via Podophile.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podophile</title>
		<link>http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-33763</link>
		<dc:creator>Podophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-33763</guid>
		<description>The new nano does not have a hard drive. It's flash memory-based, just like the old iPod nanos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new nano does not have a hard drive. It&#8217;s flash memory-based, just like the old iPod nanos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aamna</title>
		<link>http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-33760</link>
		<dc:creator>aamna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podophile.com/2007/09/05/nike-ipod-interface-updated-for-new-ipod-nano/#comment-33760</guid>
		<description>What I dont understand is that running with the ipod that had a hard drive was supposed to damage the ipod and limit its life.  How come the new nano therefore has one?  I am teetering between wanting the next newest thing, and hording 'old' nanos that won't crap out.  It already freaks out when it gets condensation on it when I have it strapped on for running.  Ipods make no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I dont understand is that running with the ipod that had a hard drive was supposed to damage the ipod and limit its life.  How come the new nano therefore has one?  I am teetering between wanting the next newest thing, and hording &#8216;old&#8217; nanos that won&#8217;t crap out.  It already freaks out when it gets condensation on it when I have it strapped on for running.  Ipods make no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
